The NCAA’s move to extend the college football playoff is all about money


Clemson and Alabama are two of the four teams that have dominated the CFP landscape.  It is not likely to change to an expanded format.

Clemson and Alabama are two of the four teams that have dominated the CFP landscape. It is not likely to change to an expanded format.
Photo: AP

Well, ladies and gentlemen, it looks like a 12-team college football playoff format could be on the horizon.

The College Football Playoff working group, which consists of SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey, Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby, Mountain West commissioner Craig Thompson and Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick, is scheduled to release a recommendation for an extended playoff format.

It’s an interesting idea that will create more football playoffs for Division One teams that could be fun. It will probably create even more money for schools and conferences.

But we don’t have kids here, it won’t solve parity in college football as many have been brainwashed to believe. Schools and playoff organizers want you to think it’s about equality and everyone getting a hit, when in fact it’s more focused on generating more money in a sport that refuses to pay for its work. .

I’m not even angry that playoff organizers and schools are making more money, I just want them to come out and say that and then pay their workers accordingly. But they won’t, especially with growing NIL.

If you want to fix parity in college football, you have to make stricter rules on recruitment so that every 5-star athlete can’t attend Clemson, Alabama, Ohio State, or Oklahoma, which have dominated the current four-team format. . Of the 28 places available in the playoffs since 2014, those schools have counted 20.

But the NCAA can’t limit recruitment and restrict where these 5-star athletes choose to go to play, so they’re stuck between a rock and a hard place. And their solution is just to add more games, when in reality what we will continue to see are the same schools that constantly fall into the “Final Four” every year … again.

Want to know why? Because they still have the best players on the field 9 out of 10 times. If you want evidence of this, just look at most of the 1-seed versus 4-seed games we’ve had in the college football playoffs since 2014. Most of these matchups have been duds because, in one typical college football season, there are not four teams good enough to win a national title. And there certainly won’t be 12.

In addition, the NCAA is now introducing the possibility of more injuries for student-athletes, so they may have to go outside and play more games in a sport that is already violent.

If it happens, it won’t achieve the goals that playoff organizers and schools say it will have. But we know that’s the real reason here.

Luckily for the fans, this might give us some more fun playoff games but it probably won’t change the overall result. You will see that the best traditional teams with the best talent win.

It’s that simple. But hey we’ll see how it goes.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *